KATE MOSS WILL NOT FACE COCAINE CHARGES DUE TO LACK OF EVIDENCE
Presumably she's snorted the whole lot by now.
posted by ENGLISH RANTER at Thursday, June 15, 2006
Thursday, June 15, 2006
UPDATED HARDLY EVE.R.
****CONTAINS PROFANITY****
Scroll down this page for lots of posts
THE HOME PAGERECENTLY ON E.R.
- EXHIBIT A
- EXHIBIT B
- HERO OR VILLAIN?
- E.R. ON TOUR: NOW IT'S FRANCE
- ALZHEIMERS VACCINE "SUCCESSFULLY TESTED ON MICE"
- HEATHER MILLS "MCCARTNEY" TO SUE OVER CLAIMS SHE W...
- THREE GUANTANAMO SUICIDES "A PR STUNT" TO GET ATTE...
- US BULLSHIT GOES ON - EVEN OVER THE DEATH OF THIS ...
- CHINA BANS ENGLISH RANTER (Oh yeah, and something ...
- BLAIR MEETS FORMER NAZI FOR TIPS ON CHANGING HIS I...
...KEEP ON SCROLLING
E.R. BLOGSQUADS
UNSPONSORED LIES
"If this isn't nice, I don't know what is!'' - Kurt Vonnegut
"He's the reason I left the country" - Infinite Muppets
"An empire of dirt" - Johnny Cash
"It's good, but more bile please" - Duncan The Uncivil Servant
"It sounds very nice dear" - My Mum
11 Comments:
1 rule for them eh?
That doesn't prove anything. What's you point?
Right, then. So CCTV footage isn't admissible then?
Evidence is a very fluid concept.
Actual Photos of a crime being committed is one thing, but it's much better to have a Government report that insinuates that something might have happened or that something might exist.
That is much better evidence.
serious question fom me for a change. my sister is a single parent. if she was photographed cutting and snorting coke, how long would it be before the social services were knocking at her door?
fucking hypocritical bastards, and don't get me started on that skinny cunt of an ex. how many times do you think we could be arrested and released without charge for carrying class a drugs before we got sent down.
dullard you nailed it buddy.
girls just wanna have fun
Fuck her, she has to stay skinny somehow, right?
You mean, you can be charged for having taken drugs in the past? WTF is that going to accomplish?
An update on this story - Kate wasn't charged because there wasn't sufficient evidence to know which drug she was snorting. Though anyone who's tried snorting MDMA will know that it's not a good idea, and speed ain't much fun for your nozza either. As someone in favour of legalising drugs, I'm not that pissed off about it, but the absolute hypocrisy of this decision is laughable. If I'm caught on camera punching someone, I could be charged with causing Grievous Bodily Harm but later found guilty of assault. It seems odd that in this circumstance could not Kate have been charged with snorting class A's and then later found guilty of snorting class B's, if that was her defence?
never happen, but the most important part of this is the £250,000 it has cost the police to "investigate". fuck me, my mother has never even seen drugs, but she new what she was up to!
quarter of a million quid to study the front page of the daily mirror?
bet the mets xmas bash is a good one this year! i hear it's in dubai.
and as for kate? yup, i still would!
Congrats on getting your joke in the Observer Review today!
Post a Comment
<< Home